Sponsored Links

Marketing Comet Newsletter


  • Free Newsletter
    Sign up and I'll send you a free copy of: 21 Reasons Most Small Business Marketing Fails
    Name
    Email Address

Small Business Marketing


Syndicate This


  • Add to Google

    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader

    Subscribe in Rojo

    Add Marketing Comet - Small Business Marketing Secrets to Newsburst from CNET News.com

Bookmark This


Blog Stuff

« April 2006 | Main | July 2006 »

U.S Supreme Court Destroys Consumer Rights

I have yet to use this blog to post anything vaguely political or off - topic, but today I feel I need to act.

A recent Supreme Court decision  is so incredibly wrong and dangerous to consumers I believe that people need to speak out. Only a new law enacted by congress can protect you.

The ruling is in the case Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna et. al. The Supreme Court ruled that the arbitration clause in a contract - even if the rest of the contract was induced by fraud and completely illegal is upholdable. AND, they ruled that this applies not only to federal courts but to state courts.

"So What?" You ask.

  1. Companies are now 100% free to commit fraud or any other odious act, and then they can force a consumer into arbitration.
  2. Arbitration is notoriously more difficult than litigation, more expensive and less accessible to consumers who may not have the money to fight things out.
  3. Arbitration is secret, where litigation is public record. One of the things that keeps companies honest is the fact that if they are sued the proceedings come out to the light of public scrutiny. Companies are now free to act even illegally without a word being allowed out in public.
  4. The Supreme court completely squashed the ability for the states to enforce their own contract laws. They said that the Federal Arbitration laws apply to state courts. This is entirely unconstitutional.

The supreme court of Montana was recently forced to uphold this ruling, which it sis with a significant amount of protest:

Justice James C. Nelson said in a concurring opinion, "To say that my concurrence is without enthusiasm, however . . . grossly overstates my exuberance for our decision. Unfortunately, our ability to come to any other conclusion is cabined by the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Buckeye."

My frustration with our inability to reach a legally correct, fair and just result in this case stems directly from the fact that the United States Supreme Court has, from the beginning, improperly conflated the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) into something which Congress never intended it to be," he said.

"Indeed, under the High Court's jurisprudence, the FAA and pre-dispute arbitration clauses in contracts of adhesion have now become little more than instruments of economic Darwinism by which predatory lenders-such as Beneficial and Buckeye-and other large corporations victimize main-street businesses, the unsophisticated, the elderly, the poor, and what is left of the middle class," he said.

To recap from the legal-eze:

Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna et. al.

  • Is legally incorrect
  • Is unfair and unjust
  • Oversteps the way Congress meant the Federal Arbitration Act to work
  • Will lead to victimization of small businesses, the middle class, the poor, and the unsophisticated (and how many of have a degree in law?)

As a small business owner, and someone whose clients are small business owners - this SCOTUS ruling scares the living hell out of me.

If you have agreements with any large businesses, including cell phone providers, banks, lenders, vendors - you probably have an arbitration clause in your agreement. You probably didn't even read it. If you do, you are now almost totally screwed if these large businesses ever decide to screw you over or do something illegal. They can stop you cold from suing them, even if you are entitled, and even if they used fraud to get you to sign the agreement.

Notice to all potential perpetrators of fraud:  The Supreme Court has said that your victims are pretty much fair game a long as you get them to sign something with an arbitration clause in it.

What you must do right Now!

  1. Read every agreement you sign and watch out for anything that mentions arbitration in them. Your best bet is to consult a lawyer before signing any agreement.
  2. Educate your friends and family about the repercussions of this incredibly dangerous Supreme Court decision. Most people don't know what being forced into arbitration means, and how they are signing away their recourse should things go wrong.
  3. You MUST write your Congressional representatives and get them to act. The only thing that might take the teeth out of this decision is an act of congress. To write you congressperson just click here. To contact your senators click here.

Get outraged because, unless you have about a billion dollars in the bank, the Supreme Court has just declared you an open target.

J D Moore - Marketing Comet.


No I Don't Want To Give You a DNA Sample Too!

I am in the position to evaluate a lot of web services and software for my own use and for my clients. I also receive approximately 2500 SPAM messages a day. I filter, but it's annoying and sometimes my SPAM filter grabs email that I want to read.

So I am really annoyed every time I go to download a free trial, or look at a demo and I have to give all my identifying information and email. Sometimes these companies like to really annoy me and make me fill out a demographic survey.

I know - I'm a marketer and I understand gathering contact info is important. It's even more important that, if I give you my info, you give me something valuable in return. Since I haven't identified how valuable your product or service is yet I am probably going to:

  1. Forget it and look at different products.
  2. Give you false information.

Recently I filled out an on-line account application so that I could run a search on a mailing list database and get a quote for a client. I had to do this to see how many records there were with my criteria, and how much it would cost to purchase the list.

Within 5 minutes my phone was ringing with a salesperson from the mailing list broker. Then again the next day, and the next. Different sales people called me from that company every day for over a week. ANNOYING! They have convinced me that I don't want to do business with them.

Here are a few rules for gathering customer contact data on-line:

  • Make sure there is some reason for gathering the data other than you want your poorly trained telemarketers to call.
  • Give customers something in return for providing the data. It could be a free report, or a discount coupon or something of value.
  • Only require information that you really need and make other data optional. I'm reluctant to give my phone number, but I require it for people that request a phone consult with me. How else am I going to call them?
  • Make it very clear what you are going to do with the information. If you're going to do something with the information that would make people think twice about sharing it, you better check your ethics,
  • Keep your word. give customers what you promised, keep their information safe, don't SPAM them.

By the way, the definition of SPAM is unsolicited commercial email. Just because somebody filled in a form to download free trial software - that doesn't mean you get to bombard them with sales pitches for stuff they didn't want. If you have multiple offerings, have checkboxes that allow customers to request information they are specifically interested in.

The Marketing Comet Principle at work is: Don't annoy your customers.

J D Moore - Marketing Comet